Last Updated on 06 Aug, 2026

Evidential Compliance Assessment (ECA): Retrospective review of HTA Reportable Incidents (HTARIs)

Following a recent inspection within the Post Mortem sector that identified significant failures in the reporting of HTA Reportable Incidents (HTARIs), the HTA is undertaking a sector-wide Evidential Compliance Assessment (ECA) for all licensed establishments operating within the Post Mortem sector. 

The purpose of this exercise is to provide assurance that all incidents meeting HTARI reporting criteria have been appropriately reported to the HTA and to identify any retrospective incidents. 

Add paragraph

Who must participate?

All HTA-licensed establishments in the Post Mortem sector are required to complete a mandatory Declaration as part of this ECA. The Declaration must be completed by the Designated Individual (DI) for the licence. 

Key Dates

Activity

Date

Webinar session to support DIs and governance leads in completing the exercise

31 July 2026 (10.30am)

Drop-in sessions providing advice and support

Weekly from 31 July to 25 September 2026 (11am)

ECA Declaration issued

10 August 2026

Deadline to submit Declaration

18 September 2026

Deadline to submit retrospective HTARI reports

30 September 2026

Required actions for licensed establishments to complete

Step 1: Review incident records

DIs must undertake a retrospective review of incident records covering the period 1 April 2015 to 30 June 2026

The review should include:

  • Local incident records and logs for all licensed areas, including maternity and histopathology where applicable.
  • Near-miss incidents meeting HTARI reporting criteria have been submitted to the HTA.
  • Unreported incidents identified during an HTA inspection that were not submitted through the portal as they were managed via the CAPA process.

Submit Your Declaration

Following completion of the review, the DI must declare, by the 18 September, either:

Option A – Full Compliance

The review confirms that all incidents, including near misses, meeting HTARI reporting criteria have already been reported to the HTA. 

Option B – Unreported Incidents Identified

The review identifies incidents, including near misses, that should have been reported but were not submitted to the HTA. The DI will be required to declare the number of unreported incidents identified. 

 

Step 2: Submit Retrospective HTARI Reports

Where unreported incidents are identified, DIs must submit retrospective HTARI reports through the HTA Portal by 30 September 2026

DIs are encouraged to begin reporting as soon as their Declaration has been submitted.

Incomplete or missing records:

For gaps in incident records, incomplete incident logs, or records that are unavailable or inaccessible for part or all of the review period, establishments are still required to report where they are aware that an incident occurred. This will help reduce the risk of under-reporting and support a more complete assessment of retrospective HTARI reporting.

  • Where an establishment is aware that an incident occurred, but only limited information is available, the incident should still be reported to the HTA.
  • Where records are no longer available due to records retention policies, establishments should expect to be asked to provide details of the applicable retention policy and confirmation that records were retained and disposed of in accordance with that policy.
  • Where records are unavailable for part of the review period and an establishment is unable to provide assurance that all reportable incidents would have been identified and reported, an incident report should still be submitted to the HTA. In these circumstances, establishments may consider reporting under the HTARI classification 'Any incident not listed here that could result in adverse publicity that may lead to damage in public confidence', as the absence of records means that reportable incidents cannot be ruled out.
  • If in doubt, establishments should contact the HTA at ECADeclaration@hta.gov.uk as soon as possible. 

Helpful Resources

Important Information

When submitting HTARI reports, do not include any identifiable information relating to patients, families, staff members or other individuals. This includes names, photographs or other personal identifiers. 

The retrospective review covers the period 2015 to 2026. Relevant HTARI guidance published between 2013 and March 2024 has been included, as the March 2013 guidance remained in effect until it was superseded by the June 2015 update.

Key points to consider when reviewing archived guidance are: 

  • The HTARI framework evolved from a relatively narrow focus on defined incident types in 2013 to a broader, systems-based approach to incident reporting and governance by 2024. 
  • The 2015 update introduced significant clarification of existing classifications and reporting expectations, while the 2024 guidance provided the most substantial expansion of interpretation, examples, near-miss reporting and regulatory expectations. 
  • The overall classification framework has remained largely stable throughout the period. Only one new HTARI classification was introduced: Post-mortem cross-sectional imaging of the body of a deceased person included an invasive procedure for which consent had not been given, added in 2016. 
  • Later versions of the guidance place greater emphasis on consent, traceability, organisational governance, public confidence and learning from incidents. 
  • As a result, some events that may not have been considered reportable under earlier versions of the guidance may fall within existing HTARI classifications under the current guidance.

To assist with the review, archived versions of the guidance are listed below alongside a link to the current guidance. A summary table is also provided, highlighting the HTARI classifications and the key changes made throughout the evolution of the guidance.

 

Summary table

Classification

Key Changes

Introduced / Updated

Accidental damage to a body

Expanded from a basic description to include reporting thresholds, licensed areas, operational examples, near misses and a decision tree.

2015, 2019, 2020, 2024

Discovery of additional organ(s) in a body on evisceration for a second post-mortem examination, or during the repatriation or embalming process

Expanded to include discoveries during repatriation, embalming and by funeral directors after release.

2015

Discovery of organ or tissue following post-mortem examination and release of body

Scope expanded to include tissue blocks and slides, with clearer definitions.

2019, 2020

Disposal or retention of organ or tissue against the express wishes of the family

Expanded to include tissue blocks and slides.

2019, 2020

Incident leading to the temporary unplanned closure of a mortuary resulting in an inability to deliver services

Reporting scope broadened from floods, fires and staffing issues to any significant disruption to mortuary services.

2020, 2024

Loss, disposal or retention of a whole fetus or fetal tissue (gestational age greater than 24 weeks) against the express wishes of the family

Expanded to include loss incidents and clarified scope and responsibilities.

2015, 2020

Loss, disposal or retention of a whole fetus or fetal tissue (gestational age less than 24 weeks) against the express wishes of the family

Expanded to include loss incidents and clarified regulatory scope for maternity, pathology and mortuary settings.

2015, 2019, 2020

Loss of an organ or tissue

Expanded to include tissue blocks, slides, traceability failures and transportation losses.

2019, 2020

Major equipment failure

Expanded from service disruption alone to include body deterioration, storage failures, dignity and safety concerns.

2015, 2020, 2024

Post-mortem examination conducted was not in line with the consent given or the PM examination proceeded with inadequate consent

Broadened to include inadequate consent, lack of authorisation and governance failures.

2015, 2020, 2024

Post-mortem examination of the wrong body

Clarified that preparation of the wrong body remains reportable even if identified before examination.

2020

Release of the wrong body

Expanded to include internal transfers, scanning transfers and near misses.

2020, 2024

Removal of tissue without authorisation or consent

Expanded through additional examples including blood sampling and DNA testing without appropriate consent.

2019, 2020, 2024

Serious security breach

Expanded from unauthorised access to include misuse of authorised access.

2020, 2024

Viewing of the wrong body

Expanded to include situations where the correct body is shown to the wrong family.

2020, 2024

Any incident not listed here that could result in adverse publicity that may lead to damage in public confidence

Broadened from serious complaints and media interest to include legal action, social media activity, staff behaviour and administrative errors affecting public confidence.

2015, 2020, 2024

Post-mortem cross-sectional imaging of the body of a deceased person included an invasive procedure for which consent had not been given

New HTARI classification introduced and retained in subsequent guidance.

Introduced 2016

Support for establishments

To support establishments throughout the ECA reporting period, the HTA has put the following arrangements in place:

  • Dedicated support mailbox: if you have questions about the process please contact ECADeclaration@hta.gov.uk
  • Webinar: An ECA webinar was held on the 31 July. A recording of that session is now available (link)
  • Drop-in sessions: Weekly drop-in sessions will run from the 31 July to the 25 September, between 11.00am and 12.00pm. These sessions provide an opportunity to ask questions on the reporting requirements. Register here.

How helpful was this page?

Your feedback helps us improve the website and the information on it. Give this page a star rating by clicking in the stars below.

Rate this page