Evidential Compliance Assessment (ECA): Retrospective review of HTA Reportable Incidents (HTARIs)
Following a recent inspection within the Post Mortem sector that identified significant failures in the reporting of HTA Reportable Incidents (HTARIs), the HTA is undertaking a sector-wide Evidential Compliance Assessment (ECA) for all licensed establishments operating within the Post Mortem sector.
The purpose of this exercise is to provide assurance that all incidents meeting HTARI reporting criteria have been appropriately reported to the HTA and to identify any retrospective incidents.
Who must participate?
All HTA-licensed establishments in the Post Mortem sector are required to complete a mandatory Declaration as part of this ECA. The Declaration must be completed by the Designated Individual (DI) for the licence.
Key Dates
Activity | Date |
|---|---|
Webinar session to support DIs and governance leads in completing the exercise | 31 July 2026 (10.30am) |
Drop-in sessions providing advice and support | Weekly from 31 July to 25 September 2026 (11am) |
ECA Declaration issued | 10 August 2026 |
Deadline to submit Declaration | 18 September 2026 |
Deadline to submit retrospective HTARI reports | 30 September 2026 |
Required actions for licensed establishments to complete
Step 1: Review incident records
DIs must undertake a retrospective review of incident records covering the period 1 April 2015 to 30 June 2026.
The review should include:
- Local incident records and logs for all licensed areas, including maternity and histopathology where applicable.
- Near-miss incidents meeting HTARI reporting criteria have been submitted to the HTA.
- Unreported incidents identified during an HTA inspection that were not submitted through the portal as they were managed via the CAPA process.
Submit Your Declaration
Following completion of the review, the DI must declare, by the 18 September, either:
Option A – Full Compliance
The review confirms that all incidents, including near misses, meeting HTARI reporting criteria have already been reported to the HTA.
Option B – Unreported Incidents Identified
The review identifies incidents, including near misses, that should have been reported but were not submitted to the HTA. The DI will be required to declare the number of unreported incidents identified.
Step 2: Submit Retrospective HTARI Reports
Where unreported incidents are identified, DIs must submit retrospective HTARI reports through the HTA Portal by 30 September 2026.
DIs are encouraged to begin reporting as soon as their Declaration has been submitted.
Incomplete or missing records:
For gaps in incident records, incomplete incident logs, or records that are unavailable or inaccessible for part or all of the review period, establishments are still required to report where they are aware that an incident occurred. This will help reduce the risk of under-reporting and support a more complete assessment of retrospective HTARI reporting.
- Where an establishment is aware that an incident occurred, but only limited information is available, the incident should still be reported to the HTA.
- Where records are no longer available due to records retention policies, establishments should expect to be asked to provide details of the applicable retention policy and confirmation that records were retained and disposed of in accordance with that policy.
- Where records are unavailable for part of the review period and an establishment is unable to provide assurance that all reportable incidents would have been identified and reported, an incident report should still be submitted to the HTA. In these circumstances, establishments may consider reporting under the HTARI classification 'Any incident not listed here that could result in adverse publicity that may lead to damage in public confidence', as the absence of records means that reportable incidents cannot be ruled out.
- If in doubt, establishments should contact the HTA at ECADeclaration@hta.gov.uk as soon as possible.
Helpful Resources
- Guidance on HTA Reportable Incidents (HTARIs) in the Post Mortem Sector
- HTA Portal User Guidance
- Previously submitted HTARIs can be accessed through the HTA Portal using the licence number.
Important Information
When submitting HTARI reports, do not include any identifiable information relating to patients, families, staff members or other individuals. This includes names, photographs or other personal identifiers.
Navigating archived HTARI guidance
The retrospective review covers the period 2015 to 2026. Relevant HTARI guidance published between 2013 and March 2024 has been included, as the March 2013 guidance remained in effect until it was superseded by the June 2015 update.
Key points to consider when reviewing archived guidance are:
- The HTARI framework evolved from a relatively narrow focus on defined incident types in 2013 to a broader, systems-based approach to incident reporting and governance by 2024.
- The 2015 update introduced significant clarification of existing classifications and reporting expectations, while the 2024 guidance provided the most substantial expansion of interpretation, examples, near-miss reporting and regulatory expectations.
- The overall classification framework has remained largely stable throughout the period. Only one new HTARI classification was introduced: Post-mortem cross-sectional imaging of the body of a deceased person included an invasive procedure for which consent had not been given, added in 2016.
- Later versions of the guidance place greater emphasis on consent, traceability, organisational governance, public confidence and learning from incidents.
- As a result, some events that may not have been considered reportable under earlier versions of the guidance may fall within existing HTARI classifications under the current guidance.
To assist with the review, archived versions of the guidance are listed below alongside a link to the current guidance. A summary table is also provided, highlighting the HTARI classifications and the key changes made throughout the evolution of the guidance.
Summary table
Classification | Key Changes | Introduced / Updated |
Accidental damage to a body | Expanded from a basic description to include reporting thresholds, licensed areas, operational examples, near misses and a decision tree. | 2015, 2019, 2020, 2024 |
Discovery of additional organ(s) in a body on evisceration for a second post-mortem examination, or during the repatriation or embalming process | Expanded to include discoveries during repatriation, embalming and by funeral directors after release. | 2015 |
Discovery of organ or tissue following post-mortem examination and release of body | Scope expanded to include tissue blocks and slides, with clearer definitions. | 2019, 2020 |
Disposal or retention of organ or tissue against the express wishes of the family | Expanded to include tissue blocks and slides. | 2019, 2020 |
Incident leading to the temporary unplanned closure of a mortuary resulting in an inability to deliver services | Reporting scope broadened from floods, fires and staffing issues to any significant disruption to mortuary services. | 2020, 2024 |
Loss, disposal or retention of a whole fetus or fetal tissue (gestational age greater than 24 weeks) against the express wishes of the family | Expanded to include loss incidents and clarified scope and responsibilities. | 2015, 2020 |
Loss, disposal or retention of a whole fetus or fetal tissue (gestational age less than 24 weeks) against the express wishes of the family | Expanded to include loss incidents and clarified regulatory scope for maternity, pathology and mortuary settings. | 2015, 2019, 2020 |
Loss of an organ or tissue | Expanded to include tissue blocks, slides, traceability failures and transportation losses. | 2019, 2020 |
Major equipment failure | Expanded from service disruption alone to include body deterioration, storage failures, dignity and safety concerns. | 2015, 2020, 2024 |
Post-mortem examination conducted was not in line with the consent given or the PM examination proceeded with inadequate consent | Broadened to include inadequate consent, lack of authorisation and governance failures. | 2015, 2020, 2024 |
Post-mortem examination of the wrong body | Clarified that preparation of the wrong body remains reportable even if identified before examination. | 2020 |
Release of the wrong body | Expanded to include internal transfers, scanning transfers and near misses. | 2020, 2024 |
Removal of tissue without authorisation or consent | Expanded through additional examples including blood sampling and DNA testing without appropriate consent. | 2019, 2020, 2024 |
Serious security breach | Expanded from unauthorised access to include misuse of authorised access. | 2020, 2024 |
Viewing of the wrong body | Expanded to include situations where the correct body is shown to the wrong family. | 2020, 2024 |
Any incident not listed here that could result in adverse publicity that may lead to damage in public confidence | Broadened from serious complaints and media interest to include legal action, social media activity, staff behaviour and administrative errors affecting public confidence. | 2015, 2020, 2024 |
Post-mortem cross-sectional imaging of the body of a deceased person included an invasive procedure for which consent had not been given | New HTARI classification introduced and retained in subsequent guidance. | Introduced 2016 |
Support for establishments
To support establishments throughout the ECA reporting period, the HTA has put the following arrangements in place:
- Dedicated support mailbox: if you have questions about the process please contact ECADeclaration@hta.gov.uk
- Webinar: An ECA webinar was held on the 31 July. A recording of that session is now available (link)
- Drop-in sessions: Weekly drop-in sessions will run from the 31 July to the 25 September, between 11.00am and 12.00pm. These sessions provide an opportunity to ask questions on the reporting requirements. Register here.